Chest Meeting
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


COPYRIGHT © 2004 by the American College of Chest Physicians.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paull, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Adebonojo, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Paull, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Adebonojo, S. A.

Surgery for Thoracic Malignancies


Tuesday, October 26, 2004

2:30 PM- 4:00 PM

The Effect of Alcoholism on the Prognosis of Stage III and IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Douglas E. Paull, MD*, Glenda M. Updyke, PA-C, Jaime Pacheco, MD, Hong W. Chin, MD, Michael Baumann, MD and Samuel A. Adebonojo, MD

Dayton VA Medical Center, Wright State Univ. School of Medice, Dayton, OH

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of alcoholism on survival among patients with stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS: The records of 74 consecutive patients with clinicopathologic stage III/IV NSCLC receiving treatment at a VA Medical Center were analyzed. Twenty four alcoholic (Etoh) patients [defined by a DSM-IV diagnosis of dependence (303.90), abuse (305.00), or an alcohol consumption of > 60 ounces of alcohol per day] were compared to 50 non-alcoholic (Non-etoh) patients.

RESULTS: Overall survival was worse in the Etoh group compared to the Non-etoh group, 9.5 ± 2.0 vs. 13.8 ± 1.8 months, respectively, p<0.05. Progression free survival was 7.0 ± 1.6 and 12.5 ± 1.9 months for Etoh and Non-etoh patients, respectively, p=0.02, Figure 1 . Survival differences were not explained by discrepancies in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, stage of disease, Charlson comorbidity index, smoking history, pulmonary function, liver enzymes, or nutritional parameters. Alcoholics were more likely to refuse treatment, less likely to receive multimodality treatment, received a lower total dose of radiation, and were less likely to respond to chemotherapy than non-alcoholic patients. Toxicity of chemotherapy was similar between Etoh and Non-etoh groups, Table 1
Table 1. Clinical data in patients with stage III and IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Alcoholic (Etoh) vs. Non-alcoholic (Non-etoh).

Etoh Non-etoh P value

Alcohol consumption (ounces/day) 137 ± 23 26 ± 3.7 0.0041
Divorce, jobless, homeless 16 / 24 9 / 50 0.00012
Stage of disease (III/IV) 16 / 8 30 / 20 NS2
ECOG3 performance 0.9 ± 0.1 1.2 ± 0.1 NS1
Charlson comorbidity 2.2 ± 0.3 2.2 ± 0.2 NS1
Pack years smoking 68 ± 6.9 60 ± 4.0 NS1
Bilirubin (mg/dl) 0.6 ± 0.04 0.6 ± 0.03 NS1
Albumin (g/dl) 3.8 ± 0.1 3.9 ± 0.1 NS1
Paclitaxel4 total dose (mg/M2) 456 ± 101 509 ± 59 NS1
Carboplatin4 total dose (mg/M2) 1128 ± 209 926 ± 113 NS1
Grade 2-44,5 Granulocytopenia 6 / 13 8 / 29 NS2
Stage III patients refusing treatment6 7 / 16 1 / 30 0.0012
Stage III patients receiving multimodality treatment6 8 / 16 24 / 30 0.052
Total radiation dose to primary tumor (cGy) in patients receiving radiation7 4145 ± 611 5468 ± 238 0.038
Response to chemotherapy stage III/IV patients4 3 / 13 17 / 29 0.052

1 Two tailed unpaired student t test, p< 0.05 significant, NS=non-significant.

2 Two tailed Fisher exact test, p<0.05 significant, NS=non-significant.

3 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

4 13 Etoh and 29 Non-etoh patients with stage III and IV NSCLC receiving chemotherapy.

5 NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v. 3.0, Dec. 12, 2003.

6 16 Etoh and 30 Non-etoh patients with stage III NSCLC.

7 12 Etoh and 35 Non-etoh patients receiving radiation for stage IIIand IV NSCLC.

8 Mann Whitney U test.

. Alcohol abuse (B=0.59, p=0.03, hazard ratio=1.82) and ECOG status (B=0.57, p=0.02, hazard ratio=1.77) were the two best predictors of survival in a Cox proportionate hazards model. In multiple logistic regression, alcohol abuse predicted lack of response to chemotherapy (B=2.9, p=0.03, Odds ratio=18.3).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
 
CONCLUSION: Alcoholic patients with stage III/IV NSCLC, even in the absence of cirrhosis, have a worse prognosis than non-alcoholic patients. This is due to non-compliance and a lower clinical response rate even when therapy is accepted.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Given the high prevalence of both alcohol abuse and lung cancer in the VA population, the results of this study, if confirmed, may have important prognostic and therapeutic implications.

DISCLOSURE: D.E. Paull, None.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Chest Physicians.