Chest Meeting
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


COPYRIGHT © 2004 by the American College of Chest Physicians.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sciurba, F. C.
Right arrow Articles by Knobil, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sciurba, F. C.
Right arrow Articles by Knobil, K.

COPD: Standard and Novel Therapies


Wednesday, October 27, 2004

12:30 PM - 2:00 PM

Efficacy of Advair Diskus 250/50 (Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol) or Ipratropium/Albuterol in Patients with COPD Associated with Chronic Bronchitis and/or Emphysema

Frank C. Sciurba, MD*, Chris Kalberg, PhD, Amanda Emmett, MS, Kunal Merchant, PhD, Christy Brown, PharmD and Katharine Knobil, MD

University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

PURPOSE: Advair 250/50 via Diskus in COPD has been studied primarily in patients with COPD associated with chronic bronchitis (CB). This post hoc analysis evaluated treatment effects in patients with CB + emphysema or emphysema alone.

METHODS: Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind studies comparing the efficacy and safety of Advair 250/50 BID with ipratropium/albuterol 36/206 mcg QID (IB/ALB) over 8 weeks. Patients were identified by study investigators as having COPD associated with CB, emphysema, or both.

RESULTS: Patients had similar mean baseline characteristics, including age (63-66 years), FEV1 (1.24-1.33 L; 42-44% predicted), FEV1/FVC ratio (0.50-0.52) and reversibility to albuterol (16.6-18.4%). After 8 weeks of treatment, patients with emphysema had a lower response in predose FEV1 to Advair 250/50. For Advair 250/50, all other efficacy parameters were similar regardless of COPD type. The responses to IB/ALB were more variable between disease types.

CONCLUSION: Patients with emphysema generally had the same response to Advair 250/50 as did those with CB or mixed disease, with the exception of a small difference in predose FEV1.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: These data show that Advair and IB/ALB are efficacious regardless of type of COPD; Advair 250/50 provided greater efficacy in both groups compared with IB/ALB.
Mean Change (s.e.) From Baseline at Endpoint

CB + Emphysema

Emphysema

Advair 250/50 (n=209) IB/ALB (n=192) Advair 250/50 (n=142) IB/ALB (n=156)

Predose FEV1 (mL) 132.6 (16.8)* -1.8 (15.4) 93.6 (20.8)* -4.9 (15.9)
6hr Serial FEV1 AUC (L-hr) (Week 8–Day 1) 0.36 (0.084)* -0.14 (0.70) 0.30 (0.093)* -0.30 (0.077)
AM PEF (L/min) 36.2 (3.9)* 3.6 (3.0) 36.9 (6.0)* 7.7 (4.0)
Predose Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) 160.6 (25.6)* 18.6 (25.4) 135.5 (33.0)* 15.6 (29.9)
6hr Serial FVC AUC (L-hr) (Week 8–Day 1) 0.27 (0.138)* -0.34 (0.119) 0.16 (0.149)* -0.35 (0.146)
Dyspnea Score (TDI) 2.8 (0.2)* 1.4 (0.2) 2.4 (0.3)* 1.3 (0.3)
Daytime Symptom Score (0-400 Scale) -51.6 (5.5)* -24.3 (4.9) -48.5 (6.1) -44.0 (5.3)
% Symptom-Free Nights 26.2 (3.5)* 6.3 (2.7) 21.7 (3.9)* 11.7 (3.1)
% Rescue-Free Days 35.5 (3.1)* 28.0 (3.0) 36.3 (3.9)* 25.3 (3.4)

* p<0.047 for Advair 250/50 vs IB/ALB within subgroup

DISCLOSURE: F.C. Sciurba, None.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Chest Physicians.