Chest Meeting
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


COPYRIGHT © 2006 by the American College of Chest Physicians.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grissom, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, B T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Grissom, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, B T.

Critical Care: Acute Lung Injury and ARDS


Monday, October 23, 2006

10:30 AM - 12:00 PM

CORRELATION OF CLINICAL EXAM FINDINGS AND CARDIAC INDEX IN PATIENTS WITH THE ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME

Colin K. Grissom, MD, FCCP*, Alan H. Morris, MD, Paul N. Lanken, MD, Marek Ancukiewicz, PhD, James Orme, Jr., MD, David A. Schoenfeld, PhD and B T. Thompson, MD

NIH/NHLBI ARDS Network LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT

PURPOSE: To determine, in patients with acute lung injury (ALI) or the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), if clinical exam findings believed to indicate an ineffective circulation predict a low cardiac index (CI) or low mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2).

METHODS: The NIH/NHLBI ARDS Network Fluid and Catheter Treatment Trial (FACTT) enrolled 1000 patients in a factorial design comparing conservative and liberal fluid treatment strategies using parameters from a central venous catheter or a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). We analyzed data on study days 1-7 from 478 patients randomized to a PAC. We used logistic regression to correlate low CI < 2.5 liters/min/m2 and low SvO2 < 60% with capillary refill time >2 sec, skin mottling, or cool skin, and with 24 hour fluid output and central venous pressure (CVP). We controlled for fluid treatment (liberal or conservative).

RESULTS: Prevalence of CI < 2.5 was 8% and SvO2 < 60% was 14%. High CVP (p=0.0012), low 24 hour fluid output (p=0.0135), and cool skin (p=0.0967) were associated with CI < 2.5 at p<0.1. High CVP (p=0.0002) and skin mottling (p=0.0186) were associated with SvO2 < 60% at p<0.1. The area under the ROC curve for the model predicting CI < 2.5 or SvO2 < 60% is 0.65. Skin mottling occurred in only 16 cases, but had a postive predictive value (PPV) of 0.5 for SvO2 < 60%, and the PPV increased as CVP increased. Skin mottling and a CVP > 14 mm Hg had a PPV of 0.78 for SvO2 < 60%.

CONCLUSION: Prevalence of CI < 2.5 is low and clinical exam findings of ineffective circulation are poor predictors of low CI. Skin mottling with a high CVP predicts an SvO2 < 60%.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Most patients with ALI/ARDS have a CI > 2.5 and an SvO2 > 60%. In patients with ALI/ARDS clinical exam findings of ineffective circulation have low predictive value for CI < 2.5, but skin mottling with a high CVP is predictive of low SvO2.

DISCLOSURE: Colin Grissom, None.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Chest Physicians.