Chest Meeting
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


COPYRIGHT © 2007 by the American College of Chest Physicians.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patel, R.
Right arrow Articles by Amchentsev, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Patel, R.
Right arrow Articles by Amchentsev, A.

Critical Care: Central Venous Catheters


Wednesday, October 24, 2007

10:30 AM - 12:00 PM

DECREASING CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER-RELATED BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS: A COMMUNITY HOSPITAL EXPERIENCE

Rubal Patel, MD, Ahmad Abdelwahed, MD, Saad Adoni, MD, Anthony Saleh, MD, FCCP, Arthur Sung, MD, Navatha Kurugundla, MD, Liziamma George, MD, FCCP, Suhail Raoof, MD, FCCP and Alexey Amchentsev, MD*

New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY

PURPOSE: Central venous catheter-related bloodstream Infections (CRBSI's) are considered among the most preventable class of nosocomial infections. The cost of CRBSI is significant, both in terms of morbidity and expenditure. To improve patient outcome and reduce health care costs, strategies to reduce the incidence of these infections need to be implemented.

METHODS: Our aim for this project was to reduce the CRBSI at New York Methodist Hospital. We used National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance criteria for identification of CRBSI. The infection rate was calculated for 1,000 central venous catheter (CVC) days. Three different strategies were implemented over 2 years which included: 1) restriction of femoral lines, 2) use of maximal barrier precautions, skin sterilization using chlorhexidine, removal of lines at the earliest convenience and 3) use of ultrasound for placement of lines. Data on the number of infections were collected by trained, hospital-based infection control nurses. The data were categorized into three groups; total line infection, femoral line infection and non-femoral line infection. Comparison on rates of CRBSI after each intervention was made among the groups using Poisson regression analysis.

RESULTS: A decrease in incidence-rate ratio after each intervention among all groups was noted. The total line infection rate decreased from 2.5 per 1000 CVC days to 1.0 (p= 0.152) and the femoral line infection rate decreased from 5.5 to 0.0 (p= 0.997) after all the interventions were implemented. Given that the population was small no statistical significance was observed.

CONCLUSION: Our single center multi-interventional study has shown that, CRBSI can be reduced by active interventions like use of maximal barrier precautions, removal of lines at the earliest opportunity, and avoidance of femoral lines. Also noticed was a further reduction in infection rate with use of bedside ultrasound for catheter placement.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Health care professionals should be aware of different interventions to prevent hospital- acquired infections. We were able to demonstrate that active intervention and teaching can decrease CRBSI in our patient population.

DISCLOSURE: Alexey Amchentsev, No Financial Disclosure Information; No Product/Research Disclosure Information







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Chest Physicians.