Chest Meeting
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


COPYRIGHT © 2007 by the American College of Chest Physicians.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elsammak, M. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hassan, H. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Elsammak, M. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hassan, H. I.

Pleural Disease


Wednesday, October 24, 2007

12:30 PM - 2:00 PM

OSTEOPONTIN AND C REACTIVE PROTEIN IN PLEURAL FLUID

Mohamed Y. Elsammak, MBChB, MRCP, Tamer S. Morsi, BMBCh, MRCP, Hend I. Khamis, MD, Moyassar A. Zaki, MBBS, MD, Mahmoud S. Ragab, MB,BS, MD*, Mona I. Abel Hadi, MBBS, MD and Hoda I. Hassan, MD

Department of Chemical Pathology, Medical Research Institute Alexandria Universi, Alexandria, Egypt

PURPOSE: Background The first step in the evaluation of patients with pleural effusion is todetermine whether the effusion is a transudate or an exudate. Osteopontin (OPN) isa pleiotropic integrin-binding protein with many functions. We assessed pleuraleffusion and serum concentrations of OPN and C reactive protein (CRP) in patientswith different types of pleural effusions.

METHODS: Methods The current study comprised three groups: 20 patients with transudativeeffusion, 30 patients with malignant effusion and 30 patients with tuberculouseffusion. OPN was analysed using commercially available enzyme-linkedimmunosorbent assay kit.

RESULTS: Results OPN effusion values were significantly higher in exudates (bothmalignant and tuberculous effusion cases) compared with transudative effusion.Also when compared separately, patients with tuberculous effusion and those withmalignant effusion had a significantly higher fluid and OPN effusion/serum ratiothan those with transudative effusion. Patient with tuberculous effusion had asignificantly higher serum CRP effusion and effusion/serum ratio of CRP than thosewith malignant or transudative effusion.

CONCLUSION: Conclusion OPN is significantly increased in exudative effusion compared withtransudative ones. However, serum OPN and effusion/serum OPN ratio were notsignificantly different in patients with malignant and those with tuberculouseffusions. The lack of difference in serum OPN and effusion/serum OPN ratiobetween patients with malignant and those with tuberculous effusion may beattributed to the heterogeneity of the malignant effusion group. Receiver-operatingcurves analysis has shown that effusion/serum CRP ratio outperformed effusion/serum OPN ratio as a diagnostic marker for tuberculous pleural effusion.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Elevated OPN level may suggest that the effusion is a seconadry to Tuberculous pleursy. However, CRP offer a better diagnostic performance than OPN.

DISCLOSURE: Mahmoud Ragab, No Financial Disclosure Information; No Product/Research Disclosure Information







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Chest Physicians.